<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popspotting Post: Cloud Atlas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popspotting.net/2012/10/cloud-atlas-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popspotting.net/2012/10/cloud-atlas-review/</link>
	<description>Pop Culture Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrivener</title>
		<link>http://www.popspotting.net/2012/10/cloud-atlas-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2485</link>
		<dc:creator>scrivener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popspotting.net/?p=1422#comment-2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We both used the word &quot;gimmicky&quot; to describe parts of this film.  :)  I agree about the makeup being distracting, but it wasn&#039;t the Caucasian-to-Asian transformation that was really bad; it was the Black-to-White I found freakish.  And we have very different reactions to the Timothy Cavendish sequence.  I found it dark and disturbing in the novel but oddball and funny in the film.  The film gives us a reason for Cavendish&#039;s ordeal but the novel doesn&#039;t, and in the novel one wonders if he is the victim of a prank, a misunderstanding, or something else (but the thought of some kind of revenge never occurred to me while reading the novel).  

The film rewards second and third viewings.  I&#039;ve seen it now two and two-thirds times (the first viewing was interrupted by the tsunami warning) and am more pleased with it each time.  And this is the first (of maybe four or five) film I&#039;ve seen on that huge RPX screen that was worth the higher ticket price.  It looks GREAT on the bigger screen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We both used the word &#8220;gimmicky&#8221; to describe parts of this film.  <img src='http://www.popspotting.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I agree about the makeup being distracting, but it wasn&#8217;t the Caucasian-to-Asian transformation that was really bad; it was the Black-to-White I found freakish.  And we have very different reactions to the Timothy Cavendish sequence.  I found it dark and disturbing in the novel but oddball and funny in the film.  The film gives us a reason for Cavendish&#8217;s ordeal but the novel doesn&#8217;t, and in the novel one wonders if he is the victim of a prank, a misunderstanding, or something else (but the thought of some kind of revenge never occurred to me while reading the novel).  </p>
<p>The film rewards second and third viewings.  I&#8217;ve seen it now two and two-thirds times (the first viewing was interrupted by the tsunami warning) and am more pleased with it each time.  And this is the first (of maybe four or five) film I&#8217;ve seen on that huge RPX screen that was worth the higher ticket price.  It looks GREAT on the bigger screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
